Resources for Promotion & Tenure guidelines discussion

Links courtesy of David Ainsworth:

University of Nebraska-Lincoln P&T assessment criteria
http://cdrh.unl.edu/articles/promotion_and_tenure.php

Comments on P&T assessment written for Texas A&M’s English department
http://idhmc.tamu.edu/commentpress/promotion-and-tenure/

NINES/NEH Summer Institute whitepaper/Guidelines
http://institutes.nines.org/docs/2011-documents/guidelines-for-promotion-and-tenure-committees-in-judging-digital-work/

A reminder of what’s at stake from a participant in Project Bamboo
http://www.quinndombrowski.com/dh/analysis/promotion-tenure-and-digital-humanities

Invisible Gorillas Are Everywhere: Interesting, perhaps controversial, piece

Academe Today, January 24, 2012, Invisible Gorillas Are Everywhere.

William Pannapacker reviews the 2011 HASTAC meeting (see keynotes here) and comments on technology and the digital humanities debate.

There is also mention of the MLA and AHA guidelines for evaluating digital projects. I’m guessing that would be the following:

Since we have touched on how to evaluate projects previously, perhaps this would be a good discussion item.